👋 Almost Here! Be the First to Experience It.

An AI Visibility Study by Track My Visibility

Trackdown Report: Kylie Cosmetics

Last Updated :

26 March 2026

Analyzing how a celebrity beauty brand performs across AI-generated answers in the clean, vegan, and cruelty-free makeup category

🔥 Key Finding

Kylie Cosmetics ranks #1 in AI visibility within its competitive set but appears in fewer than 1 in 4 prompts tracked. The brand dominates branded and purchase-intent queries but is almost entirely absent from category, technique, and skin-type searches.

23%

Overall Visibility

The Coverage Problem

1.4

Average Position

The Prominence Strength

#1

Competitive Rank

Leading, But Invisibly

+60

Net Sentiment

Positive, With Room to Grow

AI Engine Performance Breakdown

Each Al engine reveals a different facet of the same authority gap

Perplexity - 27%
Gemini - 28%
ChatGPT - 24%
AI Overview - 15%

Rewards verifiable claims. Mentions rely more on third-party sites like Vogue than the brand’s own site due to crawl limitations.

Strong on brand identity. Kylie Cosmetics shows up consistently on branded and comparison queries due to strong cultural recognition.

Rewards structured detail. Visibility comes from clear product, pricing, and availability data across reliable sources.

Rewards depth and accessibility. Kylie appears but underperforms because its site content isn’t easily crawlable.

Top 6 Prompts Where the Brand Was Not Visible

Prompt:

"Best cruelty-free holiday makeup bundles"

Fenty Beauty

Milk Makeup

Milk Makeup

Rare Beauty

Rare Beauty

e.l.f. cosmetics

e.l.f. cosmetics

Kylie Cosmetics

Kylie Cosmetics

Prompt:

"Top primers for oily t-zone"

Fenty Beauty

e.l.f. cosmetics

e.l.f.

NYX Cosmetics

NYX Cosmetics

Milk Makeup

Milk Makeup

Kylie Cosmetics

Kylie Cosmetics

Prompt:

"Stick vs liquid illuminator which is better?"

NARS

NARS

Fenty Beauty

Glossier

Glossier

L'Oreal

L'Oreal

atrick Ta Beauty

Patrick Ta Beauty

Kylie Cosmetics

Kylie Cosmetics

Prompt:

"Contour kit recommendations under $30"

e.l.f. cosmetics

e.l.f. cosmetics

L'Oreal

L'Oreal

NYX Cosmetics

NYX Cosmetics

Maybelline

Maybelline

Kylie Cosmetics

Kylie Cosmetics

Prompt:

"What primers work with mineral foundation?"

bareMinerals

Milk Makeup

Milk Makeup

e.l.f. cosmetics

e.l.f. cosmetics

IT Cosmetics

Kylie Cosmetics

Kylie Cosmetics

Prompt:

"Best skin prep for long-lasting makeup"

e.l.f. cosmetics

e.l.f. cosmetics

KVD Beauty

KVD Beauty

Milk Makeup

Milk Makeup

Haus Labs

Haus Labs

Rare Beauty

Rare Beauty

Kylie Cosmetics

Kylie Cosmetics

Top 5 Prompts Where the Brand Was Visible

Rank top long-wear concealers 2026

Celebrity beauty brands available worldwide

Kylie Cosmetics Sephora vs website pricing

Best celebrity holiday gift sets globally

Where to buy Kylie Cosmetics products

Top Competitors Frequently Mentioned

RankBrandPositionVisibilityKey Advantage
#1
Kylie Cosmetics
1.423%Strong when branded, weak in category
#2
Fenty Beauty
1.222% Category dominance
#3
Rare Beauty
1.612%Premium editorial authority
#4
Milk Makeup
1.48%Clean beauty positioning
#5
Haus Labs
2.56%Luxury authority

Content Infrastructure Gap Analysis

Where content investment is needed to match or exceed competitive benchmarks in the six dimensions that AI systems prioritize for brand mentions

Kylie Cosmetics radar chart

Why These Gaps Exist

These gaps are not related to product quality or brand reputation, but rather to how content is structured, validated, and made discoverable to AI systems

Crawlers are blocked sitewide

27 bots, including Google, GPTBot, and Bing, can’t access the site. As a result, AI systems rely on third-party sources like WhoWhatWear and Vogue instead of the brand itself.

No content for key search queries

There’s little to no content targeting how-to, skin-type, or product selection queries. This leaves high-intent searches to competitors like Rare Beauty and Milk Makeup.

Missing high-value pages

Some high-priority pages don’t exist or return errors, directly costing visibility and citations. Additional medium-priority gaps further limit coverage.

Lower sentiment vs competitors

With a lower sentiment score than peers, the brand has less positive, structured content for AI systems to reference, impacting how often and how favorably it appears.

Strategic Recommendations

Each recommendation addresses a specific structural weakness in how AI systems currently evaluate and surface the brand

Fix Crawler Access Immediately

  • Unblock key AI crawlers like Google-Extended and GPTBot in robots.txt. This is the highest-impact fix. Without it, other efforts won’t perform.

Create Pages for High-Priority Missing Content

  • Build 2 high-priority missing pages affecting multiple prompts.
  • cover 11 medium-priority gaps to expand query coverage.

Build Category and Technique Content

  • Create buying guides (matte vs gloss, shades by skin tone, long-wear use cases).
  • Target creator-focused queries like GRWM and product routines.
  • Add “how-to” guides for application techniques and product usage.

Own the Comparison Narrative

  • Publish comparison pages vs competitors like Fenty Beauty and Rare Beauty.
  • Control how the brand is positioned in AI-generated comparisons.
  • Cover product formats, pricing, and performance differences clearly.

What This Study Teaches About AI Visibility

AI rewards clarity over persuasion

Persuasive brand copy is less effective than clear, machine-readable explanations when competing for AI visibility.

Category ownership matters more than brand recall

Brands that build category-level hubs dominate AI answers, even if they're less famous than celebrity brands.

Comparative content unlocks disproportionate visibility

Owning your own comparison content prevents competitors and reviewers from controlling the narrative.

Depth of explanation beats surface-level detail

AI favors entities that answer "why" and "how," not just "what." Depth of explanation builds durable visibility.

Consistency across channels reinforces AI trust

AI visibility compounds when structured, validated content is consistent across every channel.

Methodology

Study Parameters:

Total Prompts

132 active prompts tracked within TMV

AI Engines

ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, AI Overview

Time Window

March 20, 2026 to March 26, 2026

Category

Celebrity-founded Makeup & Cosmetics

Intent Mix

Commercial-heavy with supporting informational, comparison, and trust queries

Prompt Design:
  1. Each prompt mapped to one primary intent category (commercial, informational, comparison, trust/validation)
  2. Strong majority of non-branded prompts to test category authority vs brand recall
  3. Mix of short, direct questions and longer, descriptive queries mirroring natural AI usage
  4. Aligned with core themes: clean/vegan makeup, skincare-infused foundations, celebrity brand trust, sensitive-skin suitability
Limitations:
  1. AI responses evolve over time; results represent a snapshot of current behavior
  2. Prompt selection influences visibility patterns; different prompt sets may yield different results
  3. Brand-controlled content changes can rapidly affect AI visibility
  4. Results specific to beauty category; patterns may differ in other industries