See what AI says about your brand. Get your free
An AI Visibility Study by Track My Visibility
Last Updated :
Rare Beauty ranks #2 overall with 8% visibility, trailing e.l.f. Cosmetics by 14 percentage points. The brand appears in 4 of 50 prompts, concentrated in niche categories like cruelty-free and festival looks. Sentiment remains strong at +74, but coverage gaps exist in everyday essentials and hydration-focused queries.
The Coverage Problem
The Prominence Strength
Overwhelmingly Positive
Each Al engine reveals a different facet of the same authority gap
ChatGPT rewards brand specificity and ethical positioning in makeup queries. Rare Beauty ranks #1 here with 12% visibility, winning on cruelty-free and specialty product angles.
Perplexity favors comparative product recommendations and trend-focused content. Rare Beauty appears in only 4% of responses, suggesting limited presence in trend and comparison contexts.
Prompt:
Prompt:
Prompt:
Prompt:
Prompt:
Prompt:
Buy certified cruelty free makeup online
Waterproof liquid blush for beach vacations
Festival season face and body highlighter picks
K-beauty style tints alternatives worldwide
| Rank | Brand | Position | Visibility | Mentions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 |
|
1 | 22% | Appears in 11 responses |
| #2 |
|
1 | 8% | Appears in 4 responses |
| #3 |
|
2 | 8% | Appears in 4 responses |
| #4 |
|
2 | 6% | Appears in 3 responses |
| #5 |
|
- | 0% | Appears in 0 responses |
Where content investment is needed to match or exceed competitive benchmarks in the six dimensions that AI systems prioritize for brand mentions
Rare Beauty missed 5 prompts on hydrating lipsticks, dewy foundations, and sweat-resistant finishes. e.l.f. and Glossier dominated these queries with product-specific language.
Zero visibility in minimal makeup kits and everyday essentials checklists. e.l.f. and Maybelline captured these educational prompts by positioning as accessible entry points.
Brand absent from prompts about deeper skin tones and natural finishes. Competitors didn't dominate here either, signaling an underserved opportunity for inclusive positioning.
Perplexity mentions Rare Beauty in only 4% of responses versus ChatGPT's 12%. Expanding presence on Perplexity requires trend-forward content and comparative product frameworks.
Rare Beauty dominates cruelty-free queries but remains invisible in adjacent categories. Niche wins require deliberate expansion into related product and benefit claims.
ChatGPT rewards brand-specific recommendations while Perplexity favors trends and comparisons. Single-model dominance limits overall reach and requires dual-channel content.
e.l.f. wins essentials and beginner prompts through accessible, how-to framing. Rare Beauty's premium positioning misses these high-intent, low-barrier queries.
Rare Beauty's +74 sentiment is competitive, but appearing in only 8% of prompts limits impact. Positive mentions mean little without broader visibility.
Skin tone inclusivity and texture-specific claims show low competitor saturation. These underserved areas offer faster paths to visibility than crowded categories.
50 unique prompts tracked within TMV
ChatGPT, Perplexity
May 19, 2026 to May 26, 2026
makeup, face makeup, lip products, eye makeup, brushes and tools, setting and finishing products, skincare/makeup prep, gift sets, vegan and cruelty-free cosmetics
Commercial-heavy with supporting informational, comparison, and trust queries